HTB: SquatBot Challenge
SquatBot - HackTheBox Challenge Writeup
Challenge Information
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Name | SquatBot |
| Category | Forensics |
| Difficulty | Hard |
| Author | d3vn0mi |
Description
An AWS development company providing full-scale cloud consulting and AWS application development services has fallen victim to a security breach. Despite maintaining robust cyber hygiene practices and implementing safe development procedures, malware has successfully penetrated their defenses.
Your task is to analyze a memory dump obtained from the compromised server and investigate the malware’s behavior and attack vectors to understand how the breach occurred.
Challenge Objective
- Analyze the provided memory dump from the compromised server
- Identify malware behavior and execution patterns
- Determine the attack mechanism used to bypass security controls
- Extract forensic artifacts related to the compromise
Solution Overview
This forensics challenge requires memory analysis techniques to uncover malware behavior in a compromised AWS development environment. The investigation involves:
- Memory Dump Analysis - Loading and examining the memory dump with appropriate forensics tools
- Process Analysis - Identifying suspicious processes and their execution context
- Malware Behavior - Tracking system calls, network connections, and file operations
- Artifact Extraction - Collecting evidence of the attack and exploitation techniques
Key Steps
Step 1: Memory Dump Acquisition and Initial Analysis
Begin by examining the memory dump file and determining its properties:
# Identify dump file format and sizefile memory.dumpls -lh memory.dump
# Use volatility to analyze the dumpvolatility3 -f memory.dump windows.infoStep 2: Process Enumeration
List all running processes at the time of the dump:
# Enumerate processesvolatility3 -f memory.dump windows.pslist
# Check for suspicious process treesvolatility3 -f memory.dump windows.pstreeStep 3: Malware Detection
Scan for suspicious processes and DLLs:
# List loaded DLLsvolatility3 -f memory.dump windows.dlllist
# Check for injected code or suspicious modulesvolatility3 -f memory.dump windows.modulesStep 4: Network Connections
Examine network activity at the time of compromise:
# List network connectionsvolatility3 -f memory.dump windows.netscan
# Check listening portsvolatility3 -f memory.dump windows.netstatStep 5: File System Analysis
Investigate file operations and persistence mechanisms:
# Dump files from memoryvolatility3 -f memory.dump windows.filescan
# Extract suspicious filesvolatility3 -f memory.dump -o dump/ windows.dumpfilesStep 6: Registry Analysis
Check Windows registry for malware artifacts:
# Examine registry hivesvolatility3 -f memory.dump windows.registry.printkey --key "Software\\Microsoft\\Windows\\Run"
# Check for persistence mechanismsvolatility3 -f memory.dump windows.registry.printkey --key "Software\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\Run"Tools Used
- Volatility3 - Memory analysis framework for extracting artifacts from memory dumps
- strings - Searching for readable strings within binary data
- grep/regex - Pattern matching for artifact identification
- xxd/hexdump - Hex analysis of suspicious binaries
- file - File type identification
Key Learnings
- Memory Forensics Depth - Memory dumps contain comprehensive forensic artifacts including process execution, loaded modules, network connections, and registry state
- Malware Behavior Patterns - Understanding process injection, DLL loading, and persistence mechanisms is crucial for identifying compromises
- AWS-Specific Vectors - Development environments may have trust relationships or credentials in memory that attackers exploit
- Artifact Chain - Following the chain of artifacts (processes → DLLs → files → network → registry) reveals the complete attack narrative
- Volatility Plugins - Specialized plugins help identify rootkits, injected code, and suspicious patterns that manual analysis might miss
Notes
The challenge emphasizes practical memory forensics skills essential for incident response in cloud-native environments. The compromised AWS development company’s case demonstrates how even security-conscious organizations can fall victim to sophisticated attacks targeting the development pipeline.